Structuring a joint venture arrangement based on musharakah mutanaqisah

Screen Shot 2018-06-12 at 4.30.11 PMBy Ahmad Syahir Yahya, AZMI & Associates

 

Parties to a joint venture arrangement that wish to form a joint venture in accordance with the principles of Shariah may consider forming such a venture based on the musharakah mutanaqisah concept.

Musharakah mutanaqisah
Musharakah mutanaqisah simply means diminishing partnership. According to Shariah Standards published by Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions’ (AAOIFI), musharakah mutanaqisah refers to “a form of partnership in which one of the partners promises to buy the equity share of the other partner gradually until the title to the equity is completely transferred to him. This transaction starts with the formation of a partnership, after which buying and selling of the equity take place between the two partners. It is therefore necessary that this buying and selling should not be stipulated in the partnership contract. In other words, the buying partner is allowed to give only a promise to buy. This promise should be independent of the partnership contract. In addition, the buying and selling agreement must be independent of the partnership contract. It is not permitted that one contract be entered into as a condition for concluding the other” (AAOIFI, 2008, Shariah Standard No.12, paragraph 5/1, page 217).

Brief description
Musharakah mutanaqisah can be applied in various types of business ventures including for property development. In the case of a venture for property development, the brief description of the venture is as follow:

  1. Partner A and Partner B will jointly acquire and develop the project land. Partner A shall contribute a certain sum as the initial payment, being Partner A’s initial payment, for instance, 90 percent of the total cost for acquisition and development cost of the project land (Total Cost). Partner B shall contribute a certain sum as the initial payment, being Partner B’s initial payment, for instance, 10 percent of the Total Cost.
  2. During the co-ownership period, Partner A will lease the Partner A’s ownership share to Partner B on the basis of Ijarah (Lease) for the rental payment and subject to the terms and conditions as set out in the Ijarah Agreement.
  3. Partner A then appoints Partner B as its service agent in relation to the project land upon the terms as stated in the Service Agency Agreement.
  4. At the expiry of the co-ownership period, Partner B undertakes to acquire Partner A’s ownership share by making the acquisition payment promptly in accordance with a sale contract. Partner A’s ownership share corresponding to the acquisition payment made by Partner B is thereafter fully transferred from Partner A to Partner B until the project land is wholly and fully owned by Partner B.
  5. The rental payment shall cease immediately upon Partner B having fully paid the acquisition payment and fully acquired Partner A’s ownership share in the project land from Partner A, but in any case immediately upon the expiry of the Ijarah tenure.

Documents involved
Based on the brief description above, the relevant agreements involve for the joint venture arrangement based on musharakah mutanaqisah are as follows:

  1. Musharakah Mutanaqisah Agreement, to regulate on the formation of the joint venture based on the musharakah mutanaqisah concept and the co-ownership of the project land between Partner A and Partner B.
  2. Sale Contract, to regulate on the sale of Partner A’s ownership share in the project land from Partner A to Partner B according to the agreed terms in the Musharakah Mutanaqisah Agreement.
  3. Ijarah Agreement, to regulate on the lease arrangement of the portion of the project land owned or beneficially owned by Partner A to Partner B.
  4. Declaration of Trust, whereby Partner B will declare that it shall hold the portion of the ownership share and rights in the Project Land that it does not own during the co-ownership period, in trust for Partner A subject to the terms of the Musharakah Mutanaqisah Agreement.
  5. Service Agency Agreement, to regulate on the appointment of Partner B as service agent of Partner A in respect of the project land.
  6. Purchase Undertaking by Partner B, whereby Partner B undertakes to acquire Partner A’s ownership share in the project land upon occurrence of the event of default.

Shariah requirements
In structuring of a joint venture based on musharakah mutanaqisah, it is very important to ensure that the structure and all documents involved are in accordance with the Shariah principles. In the context of Malaysia, if the parties to the joint venture are Islamic financial institutions licensed or governed by the Central Bank of Malaysia, the parties must comply with the guidelines and all policy documents issued by the Central Bank of Malaysia including the policy document of Musyarakah issued on April 20, 2015.

Conclusion
Musharakah mutanaqisah is a viable structure as an alternative to a normal joint venture arrangement and this model can be applied and explored by any party especially for those who requires the venture to comply with the Shariah principles.

 

AZMI_2017Logo
W: www.azmilaw.co.id

E: general@azmilaw.com

T: (603) 2118 5000 ext 5028

Similar Posts

  • Energy & Projects Report

    Middle East & Africa public-private partnership (PPP) guideNeil Cuthbert and Atif Choudhary of Dentons analyse the emergence of PPP’s in the Middle East and how selected emerging markets in Africa have recently looked to introduce a PPP legal framework.
    Investing inIndonesia’s waste-to energy (WTE) sector – Building a WTE power plant requires a huge amount of investment, but, with limited government funding available, other financing sources are badly needed. Veronica Situmorang, Donke Kafi and David Harrison of DK & Situmorang Lawyers explain the options.

  • Representing Corporate Asia & Middle East Survey 2013, including Firms of the Year

    Welcome to our landmark 7th annual Representing Corporate Asia & Middle East Survey Special Report, which includes the In-House Community’s picks for Firms of the Year, 2013. The Survey, which remains the largest and most objective of its kind, contains the views of in-house counsel as they weigh in on, amongst other things, the areas of most concern to them in fulfilling their role in their own jurisdiction, how they hire in-house counsel, and the factors which most influence their selection of external counsel. In addition, you will find a full rundown of the firms, (broken down by jurisdiction and sector) which have made the strongest and most positive impressions on the In-House Community in Asia and the Middle East over the past 12 months.

  • M&A Special Report

    Our M&A Special Report launches with an article from Eversheds on ‘The M&A Blueprint: from inception to integration.’ Here Stephen Kitts, Managing Partner – Asia discusses the importance of a team of professionals providing the right “connective tissue” to see a deal through to its conclusion. Huang Jianwen, Partner at King & Wood Mallesons then sheds light on some of the cultural issues that can sometimes vex foreign parties in the context of outbound dealings with China. Christopher Osborne, Partner at Watson Farley & Williams (Thailand) Ltd updates us on changing trends in the M&A landscape in Thailand and Brian Chia, Partner at Wong & Partners explains why Malaysia is poised for an upswing in foreign investment. Peter Kasanda, Legal Director and Michael Strain of Clyde & Co round up our Special Report with their take on how the surge in M&A deals in Africa has come about.

  • IP & TMT Special Report

    ASIAN-MENA COUNSEL’s latest IP & TMT Special Report, (Vol 11 Issue 6) features a presentation by Lee International IP & Law Group, co-hosted by ASIAN-MENA COUNSEL, on Brand Protection Strategies for Korea. In a concurrent open discussion with special In-House Community guests, senior foreign attorney, Nicholas Park talked about the counterfeiting situation in South Korea and advised on the legal actions and strategies that could assist organisations in combatting the problem. Joining forces for our Special Report, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Fangda Partners explained the implications of the merger between Two Powerful Chinese media regulators.